台新新光金控

Stakeholder Engagement
Stakeholder Engagement

Material Topics

Identification of Material Topics

This year, Taishin FHC identified material topics based on the recommended steps in the GRI Standards and the concept of double materiality. In 2022, we assessed the financial materiality of 19 sustainability, then focused on redefining the topics based on the impacts of these issues on the economy, environment, and people, subsequently identified 8 topics with positive impact and 14 topics with negative impact, respectively, and determined which material topics to include in sustainability reporting on the basis of an analysis of the degree of impact and likelihood of occurrence and the recommendations provided by experts and external stakeholders at each step. In 2023 and 2024, we re-examined and evaluated the sustainability topics and positive/negative impacts defined in the previous year, coordinated with various units of Taishin FHC to conduct annual due diligence on each impact, and calibrated the materiality assessment by considering the annual performance of key indicators related to the impact and the annual trends. Financial materiality questionnaires were distributed to top-level managers of relevant units to complete the double materiality assessment for the year, this identification procedures has been verified by independent third parties KPMG and the British Standards Institute (BSI), and the statement is detailed in the appendix of this report.The materiality analysis procedures implemented this year are explained below:

Procedures for the Identification of Material Topics

Analysis procedures 1.Definitions of impact 2.Evaluation of materiality 3.Ranking and calibration of evaluation results 4.Approval of the managemen
  • Description
    • By adopting the steps and contents recommended in the GRI Standards, Taishin FHC used the list of 19 sustainability topics as the basis and appointed an external sustainability consultant to redefine the list based on the impact of the issues.
    • This year, the aforementioned sustainability topics, definitions, and impact were re-examined and evaluated
  • Impact Materiality

    • Relevant units of Taishin FHC evaluated the degree and likelihood of impact. Degree of impact was assessed by taking into consideration the value chain, significance, and management or remedial measures associated with the impact. Likelihood was assessed by considering the frequency of an impact based on past occurrences.
    • This year, due diligence on each impact was conducted to re-examine the annual changes in the impact, and the results are used as the basis for correcting the materiality of the impact of each topics. The process of due diligence is described in the following paragraph on due diligence indicators.

     

    Financial Materiality

    • A financial materiality questionnaire was distributed to 14 top-level managers including the convener and team leader of the ESG Team.
    • Weights were added to the following factors: three sustainability key topics of Taishin FHC, topics that have a negative impact on human rights, and the number of entities in the value chain.
    • The topics of significant impact were prioritized based on the analysis results and corrected as recommended by the external sustainability consultant and managerial officers.
    • This year, opinions and feedback from internal due diligence were included to re-examine the likelihood of a positive /negative impact.
    • The analysis results were presented to the Board of Directors for final approval and confirmation of the material topics for this year's Sustainability Report.
  • Review of the opinions of stakeholders and experts
  • We appointed external professional sustainability consultants to provide recommendations on how to define the economic, environmental, and social impacts of these issues.

  • When re-examining the likelihood of a sustainability topic, relevant units must refer to the due diligence results over the years and give due consideration to the opinions of the stakeholders. Likelihood based on the opinions of stakeholders is evaluated as follows:

    • Employees: Refer to the number of reports concerning wrongful harm in the workplace, which are filed via employees' mailbox or employee grievance hotline; and consider the number of labor dispute cases and determine whether any of these cases involve labor-management miscommunication
    • Customer: Refer to individual customer satisfaction and net promoter score (NPS) results and review customer experiences.
    • Suppliers: Refer to situations that involve suppliers, such as supplier conferences, signed statement of commitment by suppliers, and supplier assessment status; understand the ESG management status of suppliers and determine whether suppliers are involved in ESG mismanagement.

     

    The opinions of stakeholders are also considered, to an extent deemed appropriate, when calibrating the evaluation results of relevant issues.

    • Investors: Adjust the materiality of the issues where appropriate based on day-to-day communication with institutional investors and the changes in their ESG ratings.
    • Competent authorities: Weights were added to the following factors: three main sustainability strategies of Taishin FHC, issues that have a negative impact on human rights, and the number of entities in the value chain.
  • The opinions of stakeholders are also considered, to an extent deemed appropriate, when calibrating the evaluation results of relevant issues.

    • Investors: Adjust the materiality of the issues where appropriate based on day-to-day communication with institutional investors and the changes in their ESG ratings.
    • Competent authorities: Weights were added to the following factors: three main sustainability strategies of Taishin FHC, issues that have a negative impact on human rights, and the number of entities in the value chain.
  • The evaluation results are approved by the Board of Directors of Taishin FHC.

Materiality Matrix in 2024

Based on the evaluation results for 2024, a total of 8 issues were identified as highly material, 8 issues were identified as moderately material, and 3 issues were identified as general topics. In the identification of material topics, Taishin FHC referenced the recommendations of stakeholders and external experts and decided to recognize sustainable issues that are ranked moderately material or higher as material topics, 16 material topics identified for 2024.

Questionaire

Questionaire

You are invited to fill in the questionnaire to assist us realizing the CSR fulfillment.

您正在離開本站!

您現在欲前往的網站並非搜尋結果台新新光金融控股股份有限公司有限公司(本公司)所有,而是各由其所屬之第三人所有、操縱及控制。 本站對第三人所有之網站亦無任何操縱或控制的權限。 本站上之網路指示連結功能僅為提供您的便利而設。本站及本公司對該第三人所有之網站上的內容品質、效力、正確性、完整性、即時性、適法性,及該網站上之任何言論或聯結不負任何責任。 本站及本公司亦無調查、監視第三人所有的網站上的內容之品質、效力、正確性、完整性、即時性、適法性的義務。本站上之網路指示連結功能無論於任何情形下,不能解釋成為對任何第三人網站的保證、背書、推薦或相類的聲明。 本站及本公司特於此明確宣示對於任何第三人所有網站之內容的品質、效力、正確性、完整性、即時性及適法性不負任何明示或默示的擔保責任。

即將前往的網址 : https://www.tsholdings.com.tw/news/news_04.jsp?newspage=01&readYear=2020&rowid=24441

公告

台新金控與新光金控合併案,業經金融監督管理委員會核准,並已訂定114年7月24日為合併基準日。合併後,台新金控為存續公司(合併後更名為「台新新光金控」)、新光金控為消滅公司。台新金控將以「客戶權益」為優先,兩家金控合併後,所有台新金控旗下子公司客戶的往來的權益及一切權利義務不變,不會因本合併案而受到任何影響,客戶無需做任何變更申請,敬請放心。若您有任何疑問,歡迎洽詢您的業務代表或撥打以下客服專線: 台新銀行: (02)2655-3355、台新證券: (02)4050-9799、台新人壽: (02)2171-1132、台新投信: (02)2501-3838,我們將竭誠為您服務。再度感謝您的長期支持,更期待您未來繼續惠予指導。

很抱歉,您目前使用的瀏覽器無法支援瀏覽。

建議您升級瀏覽器,以利瀏覽此網站的所有內容,謝謝您的配合。

© 台新新光金融控股股份有限公司版權所有

建議瀏覽器:IE10+, Chrome, Safari, Firefox